Insight
University of Nebraska at Omaha Breaks Ground on Major Athletics Expansion
University of Nebraska at Omaha launched a privately funded $67.5 million athletics expansion, led by the Howard L. Hawks Training Center.
The University of Nebraska at Omaha took a significant step in its long-running athletics facilities plan on Friday, September 18, holding a ceremonial groundbreaking for a $67.5 million, privately funded expansion that school leaders described as a major milestone for the department and the campus.
The project includes two separate facilities, the $55 million Howard L. Hawks Training Center and the $12.5 million Maverick Park Clubhouse. Together, the buildings represent one of the most important recent infrastructure investments tied to Omaha athletics and a clear sign of how the university wants to position itself in modern Division I competition.
University officials, donors, alumni and city leaders gathered outside Baxter Arena for the ceremony, tying the moment not just to construction timelines but to the broader third phase of Omaha Athletics' Campus Masterplan. That plan has focused on modernizing the athletic district south of Center Street and giving the Mavericks a more cohesive, visible and competitive Division I footprint.
For recruits, families and coaches, facilities stories can sometimes be treated as background noise. This one carries more weight than that. The scale of the investment, the private donor support behind it and the way the university framed the project all point to a department trying to build a more complete student-athlete environment across multiple programs.
The expansion centers on two buildings with different roles but a shared objective. The first is the Howard L. Hawks Training Center, which will become the largest piece of the project and the most visible new addition near Baxter Arena. The second is the Maverick Park Clubhouse, which will directly affect the daily routines of Omaha baseball and softball.
According to the university, the Howard L. Hawks Training Center is scheduled for completion in summer 2028. The Maverick Park Clubhouse is expected to be finished earlier, with a projected completion date of July 2027.
That sequencing matters. It means some teams could see changes to their home training environment well before the larger training center opens, while the full campus impact of the expansion will likely unfold over several years.
The new training center is being named for Regent Emeritus Howard L. Hawks, a University of Nebraska at Omaha MBA alumnus, Tenaska co-founder and longtime University of Nebraska regent who died in 2024 after serving 18 years on the board, including two terms as chairman. The naming gives the building a direct connection to both the university and the donor-driven civic support that helped bring the project to life.
University officials said the facility will stand just east of Baxter Arena and connect to the arena through an elevated skywalk. In practical terms, that location makes the building a central piece of the Mavericks' athletics district rather than a stand-alone add-on.
Inside, the university plans to include modern practice and flex competition courts, community event space and a broad range of student-athlete support areas. School leaders said the support spaces will include academic services, strength and performance operations, sports science, nutrition resources, mental health space, locker rooms and lounges for select sport programs.
That list is important because it reflects how Division I athletic departments now think about facilities. The modern benchmark is no longer just a practice gym or weight room. Competitive infrastructure increasingly includes integrated academic support, recovery, sports science and mental health resources in the same environment where athletes train every day.
For a broad-based department like Nebraska Omaha, a building like this can affect more than one headline sport. It can reshape how athletes move through a normal week, how support staff coordinate services and how the department presents itself to future recruits.
Part of what makes this project notable is what it is set to replace. Omaha Athletics has been operating many core functions out of Sapp Fieldhouse, a building that dates to 1949-50. As listed by the athletics department, Sapp Fieldhouse currently houses athletics offices, strength and conditioning, athletic training, physical therapy and academic support, while also serving as a practice site for volleyball, men's and women's basketball and track and field.
That kind of all-in-one usage is often a sign of a department stretching legacy space to meet modern Division I demands. While older buildings can carry history and utility, they usually were not designed for the volume, staffing models and specialized athlete services that define current college athletics.
Regents previously said the new training center would replace significant programming now housed in Sapp Fieldhouse and help create a more cohesive experience across sport programs. In plain terms, Omaha is not only adding square footage. It is reorganizing how athletics functions on campus.
For recruits comparing environments across Division I, details like training layout, recovery access, academic support proximity and sport-specific gathering areas often matter more than public renderings alone. Stories like this are one reason many families spend time studying broader school and sport landscapes through resources such as a college directory or a sport directory, especially when trying to compare how different campuses invest in athlete support.
The Maverick Park Clubhouse may be smaller in price than the training center, but it could have an outsized impact on the programs that use it most. The two-story building will overlook Connie Claussen Field and Tal Anderson Field and will serve Omaha baseball and softball in a way the university says those teams have never had before.
According to the school, the clubhouse will provide a shared daily home base for baseball and softball, bringing student-athletes, coaches and support staff together under one roof for the first time in school history. Planned features include year-round training areas, sports medicine space, locker rooms, lounges and coaching offices.
That is a significant operational change for both programs. For Omaha baseball and Omaha softball, a centralized clubhouse can affect everything from player development and treatment schedules to team culture and recruiting visits.
Shared infrastructure also says something about how the department sees Maverick Park within the larger athletics map. Rather than treating baseball and softball as peripheral to the arena-centered part of campus, the university is continuing to build those programs into a more permanent and connected on-campus identity.
The school noted that the project builds on recent work at Maverick Park, where Connie Claussen Field and Tal Anderson Field already strengthened Omaha's on-campus presence in softball and baseball. In 2026, Connie Claussen Field also set a softball attendance record when 2,320 fans attended a Nebraska game. That figure offered a useful reminder that facilities are not only internal assets for athletes, they also shape fan habits and public visibility.
One of the most important parts of the story is the funding model. Omaha identified the Hawks Families, the Walter Scott Family Foundation, David and Peggy Sokol, the Don C. Scott Family Foundation, the Parker Family Foundation and anonymous donors as lead supporters of the project. Because of that backing, the university has described the full $67.5 million package as privately funded.
That is not a small detail. In the current college athletics climate, major capital projects often raise questions about institutional priorities, debt, public funding and long-term sustainability. A privately funded project of this size signals substantial confidence from the philanthropic community around the university.
It also connects athletics growth to civic identity. Omaha leaders repeatedly tied the expansion to the university's role in the city, and the donor list underscores that this is not being presented as an isolated athletics spend. It is being framed as an investment in a university program that reflects and represents Omaha more broadly.
At a time when many athletic departments are trying to balance roster management, travel costs, staffing growth and facility expectations, donor support on this scale can change what is possible. It can accelerate timelines, reduce financial pressure in some areas and create momentum that extends beyond one construction cycle.
Omaha also used the groundbreaking to connect facilities growth with performance. School officials said Omaha teams reached 18 conference championship games, won 11 conference titles and made eight NCAA tournament appearances in the four years leading up to approval of the project.
That run of success gave university leaders a straightforward case to make. The argument was not simply that Omaha wants upgraded space. It was that recent competitive results, combined with academic outcomes and fundraising growth, justified a larger step.
The academic side of the message was also central. Officials pointed to a 95 percent graduation success rate and a 3.5 cumulative GPA for UNO student-athletes. Those metrics matter because major facility announcements increasingly come with a full student-athlete development narrative, not just a performance narrative. Schools know recruits and families want to see evidence that investment reaches beyond game day.
Financially, the department reported substantial momentum as well. In its fiscal year 2026 report, Omaha Athletics said it raised $62.5 million, the strongest fundraising year in department history, while also posting record totals in ticketing, corporate partnerships and concessions. Those figures help explain why the university chose this moment to present the expansion as both a reward for recent growth and a bet on future gains.
Chancellor Joanne Li connected the facilities push to a broader stretch of athletic and institutional momentum, including the men's basketball program's first NCAA tournament appearance in 2025. That reference was telling because it tied a capital project to a recent breakthrough moment that likely expanded local attention and internal confidence.
Athletics director Adrian Dowell described the new buildings as part of an effort to create an elite student-athlete experience and a department capable of competing consistently at a high level on behalf of the city. Even stripped of ceremonial language, the message was clear. Omaha sees facilities as an essential part of maintaining relevance and raising its ceiling in Division I.
That approach mirrors broader national trends. Across Division I, athletic departments increasingly treat facilities as a combined tool for recruiting, retention, performance support and institutional branding. The exact features differ by campus, but the strategic logic is similar. Schools want spaces that improve athlete development while also signaling long-term seriousness to donors, coaches and future students.
For those following recruiting and roster movement more broadly, changes like this are often easiest to understand when viewed alongside wider athlete questions about program fit, conference level and opportunity. That is why reference points such as a searchable family recruiting Q&A library can be useful in understanding how facility investment fits into bigger college decisions.
Because this story involves multiple sport programs, its recruiting implications are unusually broad. The Howard L. Hawks Training Center is designed to support athletes through academics, strength work, nutrition, sports science and mental health resources, while also offering new practice and flex competition space. That kind of integrated design can matter in initial recruitment, but it can matter just as much in athlete retention after enrollment.
For baseball and softball, the Maverick Park Clubhouse adds another layer. Program-specific daily space often influences how players experience a season, especially during long stretches of training, treatment and travel preparation. Recruits in those sports tend to notice whether a program has a true home base or whether athletes are operating out of scattered spaces.
The article's biggest recruiting takeaway is not that one building guarantees wins. It is that Omaha is trying to match on-field and on-court ambition with infrastructure that supports modern athlete expectations. In a transfer-heavy era, departments that can offer coherent day-to-day athlete environments tend to be better positioned to recruit and retain talent across classes.
That does not mean facilities override coaching, roster openings, academic fit or competitive opportunity. But they increasingly function as part of the baseline standard for Division I credibility. This project is Omaha's clearest recent statement that it intends to meet that standard more fully.
While the expansion touches the whole department, several team pages are especially relevant for following the long-term impact. The Omaha baseball program and the Omaha softball program are directly tied to the Maverick Park Clubhouse. Other programs that have relied on legacy space in Sapp Fieldhouse will also be affected as functions move into the new training center.
For a department-wide story like this, the broader University of Nebraska at Omaha college page provides the best overall context, while individual team pages help show how school-wide infrastructure decisions can affect program-by-program development.
Within the same city, other institutions offer different versions of the college athletics experience. Creighton University remains one of the most visible Division I brands in Omaha and provides a useful regional comparison point for athletes evaluating the city's college sports landscape. College of Saint Mary, while operating in a different competitive context, is another Omaha-based program that can matter for athletes looking at local options and different school settings.
Those schools are not direct copies of the Mavericks' model, but they help illustrate a wider point. In one metro area, athletes can encounter very different combinations of division level, campus feel, sport sponsorship and facilities strategy.
The core facts in this story come from the university's September 18 announcement on the groundbreaking, the prior University of Nebraska Board of Regents naming approval for the Howard L. Hawks Training Center and Omaha Athletics materials covering fiscal year 2026 revenues and existing facilities. Additional facility context comes from official athletics pages for Sapp Fieldhouse and Connie Claussen Field.
Relevant source material includes the University of Nebraska at Omaha news release on the groundbreaking at unomaha.edu, the regents approval and naming story at unomaha.edu, and the athletics department's fiscal year update at omahamavs.com. Facility background is also available through the official Sapp Fieldhouse page at omahamavs.com and the Connie Claussen Field page at omahamavs.com.
The next stage of this story will be less about ceremonial language and more about execution. The Maverick Park Clubhouse is scheduled for July 2027, which means baseball and softball observers will be watching whether construction stays on timeline and how quickly the building changes everyday operations for those programs. The Howard L. Hawks Training Center, targeted for summer 2028, will carry the broader symbolic and functional weight for the department.
Beyond construction progress, the more interesting long-term question is whether Omaha can convert this facilities momentum into sustained competitive depth across sports. The school already has recent championship appearances, conference titles, NCAA tournament bids and a record fundraising year to point to. The expansion raises the standard again. Once new space opens, the expectation will be that athlete support, recruiting presentation and program consistency all move forward with it.
That is why this groundbreaking matters beyond architecture. For the Mavericks, it marks a shift in how the university is choosing to align donor confidence, athletic success and campus infrastructure. In a crowded Division I environment, that kind of alignment can shape a program's next decade as much as any single season result.
Rosters, coaches, and division breakdowns for every NCAA and NAIA program we track.
